At some point during our transition from manufacturing economy to financial service market, we set a taint on being blue; blue collar, that is. The foundation of our great nation has been built upon three basic building blocks: democracy, capitalism and industry. Those who worked on the manufacturing lines of our industrial companies demonstrated enormous pride in all three. With the loss of one, sadly, looms the threat to all.

In his inaugural address, President Obama poetically and prophetically addressed the import of manufacturing to this renowned country. In his words:

“It has not been the path for the faint-hearted, for those who prefer leisure over work, or seek only the pleasures of riches and fame. Rather, it has been the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things — some celebrated, but more often men and women obscure in their labor –who have carried us up the long, rugged path towards prosperity and freedom.” - President Obama’s Inaugural Address

But shortly after taking office, the President disregarded the promise of his words: the need to develop incentives, programs and responsibility to promote the renaissance of U.S. Manufacturing. The new administration had the opportunity to set priorities, humble the nation and inspire a patriotic rebuild of America. However, in the panic of crisis, the government chose the path of least resistance. It reached again for the magic switch of fiscal and monetary policies, choosing to save the banks through cash, guarantees and programs. The Fed flooded the markets with the hope that it could slow the rapid plunge of GDP prior to a systemic collapse. But once disaster was averted, there was never a change in principle to address job creation through a focus on industry - to rebuild the economy bottom up with a sound foundation to withstand the next decline. Instead, the need for direct lending to small and mid-sized companies has been wholly ignored with more manufacturers liquidating daily. Such action, or rather inaction, should make us wonder whether we have lost our collective will to be the maker of things. We have taken a national stance of arrogance, founded in a belief that we should evolve beyond blue collar employment to service jobs that bring us closer to the godliness of Wall Street.

Over the last decade, on a seasonally unadjusted basis, we have lost 6.4 million manufacturing jobs, from a high of 17.4 million down to approximately 11 million. Since peak employment in 2000, when annual car production stood at 17 million, automotive and supplier service has fallen by 50%. With the start of this recent recession, 2 million manufacturing jobs have disappeared, almost one in every four total employment opportunities lost. Recovery in the manufacturing sector is expected to be very slow - most jobs lost will never again be available due to closures and transfers overseas. Liquidation brings the loss of technology, tribal knowledge and the impossible task of restarting production.

In her recent article, Why Wall Street’s Gain Has Been America’s Loss, Arianna Huffington explains that manufacturing jobs have, “traditionally delivered American families into the middle class and kept them there. There have been a number of recessions over the last few decades. And our economy bounced back in a way that made it harder for those in the middle class to stay there — and even harder for those aspiring to become middle class to get there. The loss of middle class jobs is rarely talked about in Washington. Neither is the way this useful section of our economy is being replaced by the useless section of our economy.”

This week, former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker said the “U.S. economy faces a long slog as the nation struggles to reduce the jobless rate from close to a 26 year high…,” and he recommended “the U.S. economy shift from a reliance on consumer and government spending to a greater emphasis on investments and exports as it recovers.”

Our ability to sell overseas, however, is deeply dependent on that which we make and manufacture. I remain indelibly confused by the administration’s push for greater exports while we systematically reduce emphasis on our need for industry.

At some point in our recent history, we lost our faith in the American Dream - or, at very least, significantly altered our definition. From the shop floor to the C Suite, “Made in America” has always spoken to the satisfaction of active participation in a hands-on, productive economy. With the loss of opportunity to earn a living with dignity and to take pride in heavy lifting, we could inadvertently raise a populace of permanently unemployed Americans more comfortable with programs of entitlements than with continued rejection and dejection.

This country has long been a meritocracy founded upon education and work ethic, a nation in which each one of us could overcome the circumstance of birth to live the American Dream. This is not a time in our nation’s history for panic, self-pity, entitlement or complacency; it is a time for discipline, hard work and cooperation. Call me naïve, but I believe that faced with the ugly truth, we will roll up our sleeves, raise ploughshares and stand together to rebuild America.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lynn-tilton/its-not-easy-being-blue_b_566605.html

It can be felt in the air and seen in the faces of those on the street. It is the Holiday Season, a time of charitable thoughts, unexpected giving and wishes come true. From Stockholm to Washington, even critical minds and sharp tongues have taken to more generous bent. The Nobel Prize committee ignited the holiday gifting by presenting President Obama with an ornament of beautiful gold and some greens adorning. Senior management of Goldman Sachs, no strangers to both gold and green, suddenly remembered tis nobler to give than receive, and decided to self-grant stockings filled not with coal but tax-benefited deferred shares, trading today’s immediate cash gratification for future multiples of postponed gain. Such patient self-sacrifice is aimed to avert the angry wrath of Congress, regulators and a frustrated populace. Bank of America, recipient of Uncle Sam’s generosity last year and this, surprised many on Wall Street by saying thanks and belatedly no-thanks, returning its gratitude and gifts to the U.S. Treasury. While no one has yet to candidly admit inspiration for the premature return, the bank says only that the stringed gift is no longer needed. Some speculate that Bank of America struggled with the red tape wrapping. Others reason bank executives believed the gift a good fit, but a bit too revealing (a fit with which I am warmly familiar). Regardless of reason, the early holiday return offered Treasury Secretary Geithner a chance occasion to play Santa and re-gift a few surprise holiday presents to the needy. So what if Scrooges of the Republican Party and non-believers of the Oversight Committee see this gesture as less than noble (or allowed)? It is for the elves of Treasury, not the gnomes of Wall Street and Washington to decide the naughty and nice — those who get and who do not. Did not Secretary Paulson make this clear last year with his choice of Christmas cheer?

Who should be added to this year’s Christmas party list? The big banks have been well cared for along with several large insurers, Fannie and Freddie, the auto makers and recent converts that found banking religion. Some were christened more than once. But like any good crisis, no windfall should go wasted, and with rapid decisiveness the Secretary knew just what he would do. Dusting off a plan for lending to small businesses to spur job creation, he will sprinkle half of Bank of America’s gilded gift among hundreds of small banks with direction for loans to small businesses everywhere, while recipients of Christmas cheer might, in turn, make ends meet for a bit longer and perhaps pay a Christmas bonus or two. With that, a little thoughtfulness could go a long way. Of course, tis the season of miracles and wishes. One can almost hear the words of Tiny Tim echo in the beltway: “God bless us everyone!”