Subscribe 

Posts Tagged ‘bank lending’

Obama Pay Your Dues

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

As a native New Yorker, I am forever tempted by dinner and show. Wednesday night, while neither wined nor dined, I was mesmerized by the President’s performance. The Commander in Chief used the “theater of the address” in his State of the Union speech to launch his revival of Candidate Obama, The Common Man: a wonderful mix of Mr. Smith Goes to Washington and Mr. Obama Feigns Not, He Leads Washington.

Candidate Obama took our hands and started a slow stroll down Selective Memory Lane as he recounted his arrival in town by turnip truck, his miraculous election to President and his sudden shock at finding himself “a stranger in a foreign land” of politicians and people who expected government to “do stuff”, all while the economy was teetering on the precipice of abyss with the dangers of all things “really bad.”

While he could not easily understand or persuade these foreigners, he would rather rely on Rahm Emanuel, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi to do that for him, as his mission was directed only towards “doing good” and “helping people.” President Obama saved the banks only to discover later that banks house the bankers, who covet money with bold expectations of big bonus checks, every year without consequence of risk or reward.

The funny thing about Selective Memory Lane, however, is it often leads us in circles and sometimes to dead ends. Candidate Obama takes full credit for resolving the mess he came into, but the mess he allegedly fixed was the salvation of banks. In truth, the fix was in for the banks when President Bush and Treasury Secretary Paulson appropriated money from under the TARP and gave it freely to them, no strings attached. Ben Bernanke played his part, too, when he turned the Fed into the grandest junk yard in the financial world, buying up that which no one else wanted at prices ant New Yorker would call, insane!

For a while, the official word upheld the stimulus package, cleverly crafted by Reid and Pelosi, as the reason to claim credit. Only the stimulus did not create credit nor jobs, real or imagined, and unemployment soared to desperate heights. Things were getting very confusing Wednesday night, indeed.

Everyone wanted health care reform, but ironically no one welcomed President Obama’s proposal. The Common Man recognized rapidly the bill too large, while Candidate Obama maintained the measure unpopular because at 2,000 pages, the bill was too large. Adding insult to injury, he learned a new guy in a truck was coming to town and he professed a few ideas on health care, as well. So, it was such that the stage was set this week for Candidate Obama to engage in an all-out, one-sided debate (where was Joe Wilson when we needed him?) with The Common Man, calling out boldly to the greedy bankers to give back the money, to politicians to cease being politicians and to any citizen who had a better bill on health care, the request to bring it on. I have a bill for Candidate Obama, but I believe it to be distinct from the kind he expects. I have a bill that says there is no free lunch in this town, or in Washington.

Candidate Obama took one too many wrong turns down Selective Memory Lane when he announced his plan to use $30 billion of TARP funds to make loans available to small and mid-sized businesses with the purpose of job creation in America. His mandate is a great idea. I really like it. In fact, I liked it last July when I first proposed it to the White House and the Department of the Treasury. I liked it when I created a website to garner support, and again at the time I published my white paper on the idea. I liked it when President Obama announced a jobs summit and did not invite small business owners like me — make that — he did not invite me, to the meeting. So let me borrow a little bit from Candidate Obama — “let’s make this perfectly clear” — I did not authorize The Common Man to take my idea and claim it his own. More importantly, like the common cheat in school who looks over his shoulder for the answer, The Common Man missed a key point when he copied. The money will not create jobs if it is made available only to banks.

Remember the lesson of last year: banks have bankers in them. And, in this case, many of the small banks, to whom he will give this money, have big problems and will use it to fix broken balance sheets and bad loans already held. I knew this risk when I created my plan, now known as the Obama Plan. It is for this reason that the original plan states that TARP funds are used to provide capital support to lever investments in new rescue loans made by selected experienced investors in the public sector who choose to own them.

So it is time to pay the piper — or the writer, as the case may be — and Candidate Obama, here is your bill:

2010-02-01-checkplease

Unprecedented Anger in the Face of Economic Hardship and War

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

As we start this new decade, we face the dangers of an unprecedented anger embedded in our nation as well as in countries across the the world. It is a time when divides widen, factions combat and violence erupts. We try not to speak to subjects that spread fear and panic and ’tis, of course, the season of fairy tales, happy endings and It’s a Wonderful Life.

Staying silent and standing still in the face of economic hardship, volcanic violence and a world at war will lead only to an unprepared populace further angered by perceived government apathy to setbacks ignored. There is little doubt our government is acutely aware of dangerous threats and addressing issues behind closed doors. This policy, however, defies our nation’s hunger for truth and united leadership to command us in the battle we dare confront.

In order to assuage the anger, we must carefully analyze the issues that have inspired its eruption. Enlightenment begins with the search for truth. Truth is a word that we all use easily but of which few of us understand the inherent meaning or the sacrifices necessary to follow a path that the concept defines. Truth forces us all to look at ourselves without façade; to face demons, admit frailties and acquiesce to changes of character in order to become the persons we hold ourselves to be. Living loyal to truth requires a never-ending process of self-reflection. This may appear off subject, with words more aligned to spiritual guidance than a pathway to a country repaired, but such would be perception, not reality.

Healing the economy, assuaging anger and rebuilding America will begin both with truth and self-reflection. We must all strive to be better people and to demonstrate those qualities that create light in a world gone dark. Our country’s most valuable asset is human capital, and the most potent force of nature is people standing together, moving in one direction, pure of intent and collective in consciousness. We must all be aligned in the battle of rebuilding America. This begins with acceptance of individual responsibility for our part in the current communal economic, social and spiritual malaise. We must transcend from a culture of expectation to a nation of appreciation. We must feel inspired to give and to help — gifts and aid must be greeted with gracious acceptance. Jobs must be created –employment must be embraced. Collective change begins with individual transformation.

It is difficult to ignore daily reports of violence in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran and Yemen. December also witnessed attacks on Berlusconi and the Pope in a more gentile Italy. Christmas in the U.S. will be defined by the terrorist attack that could have been. And lest we forget the populist anger and vengeance inspired by payment of AIG bonuses, the stampede of the Detroit hungry on lines for Federal help or the need for riot police on California campuses during tuition hikes, we would be remiss to the recognition of seething anger in our nation divided.

Truth is cold and hard but it is also the first step on the path of hope and salvation. We are a nation starved for truth; for solutions to plaguing problems, alignment of Wall Street and Main Street and for leadership in the battle of rebuilding America.

Mr. Geithner—Do you hear me calling?

Friday, December 4th, 2009

Dear Mr. Geithner,

I struggle to understand why you ignore my letters and calls?  I appreciate the depth and breadth of issues you face, decisions to make and responsibility to bear. Yet I came myriad times with well thought solutions to lending problems that plague our nation, built upon tactical proven business experience.  I volunteered my time, my patented portfolio construction models, and designed solutions to solve the dearth of lending to small and mid-sized companies, (“SMEs”).  With patriotic hat in hand, asking for nothing, I offered demonstrated solutions upon which the Patriarch platform, a $ 7 billion business has thrived over 9 years.  Still my letters remain unanswered and my SME Rescue Loans Program (“RLP”) lies dormant in Treasury hands.

Joblessness is a plague upon America. Including part-time workers coveting full time employ and marginally unattached, those indelibly discouraged, almost 30 million Americans suffer under weight of unemployment.  If each unemployed heads families of 4, joblessness brings suffering to 120 million Americans. I am consistent in my verse, my chorus the same for 14 months - the absence of lending to SMEs would bring rapidly rising unemployment and stall the engine of job creation.  My plans, acknowledged, would have significantly reduced populace pain.

Last October, in response to a Treasury Plan to rescue large banks without mandate to lend, I purchased ads in the Washington Post and New York Times to express deep fears that TARP-infused banks would use Treasury-injected capital to heal internal wounds by selfish means, leaving SMEs without resources for recovery.  I foretold middle market manufacturers, unsung heroes and hope for this nation would be rendered prime casualties and appealed for a national commitment to sustain our core economic base. I proposed a Provisional Federal Bank to lend directly to deserving businesses. http://patriarchpartners.com/Lynn_Tilton_WashPost_NYT.pdf

On February 2, I sent an open letter, covered by national press, acknowledging the unprecedented obstacles to America’s economy. I addressed the implausible challenges in form of ideas for consideration that, together, represented a multi-spoke approach to foster economic recovery. I warned measures beyond TARP programs needed immediate implementation to avoid a punishing downturn and that SMEs, the backbone of America and its largest employer, remained starved for credit.  I insisted upon rapid and ineradicable acceptance that America’s future relies more heavily upon revival of industry and creation of jobs than resurrection of complex financial instruments.http://www.patriarchpartners.com/open_letter_Geithner.pdf

In late March, I published an editorial titled Tim, Why won’t “you” take a chance on lending? I suggested waiting for banks to heed your call to “take a chance on lending” made little sense and held low probability for triumph. I advised reduction of distance between problem and solution to enhance probability of success should be a lesson embraced.

I questioned your bank reliance and bank confidence, the cost and time to motivate institutions to lend. I feared millions of jobs lost while awaiting banks embark upon the lending crusade.  From whence came assurances cash infused or toxic assets removed would inspire immediate lending to businesses damaged by interim starvation? I believed it time to face the harsh fact that TARP failed to revive lending. I suggested the shortest path between need to unlock credit and emergency loans available was use of Government funds. http://patriarchpartners.com/dust2diamonds/2009/03/tim-why-won’t-you-take-a-chance-on-lending/

In July, I visited Treasury to present a plan designed upon the simple premise the foremost obstacle to economic recovery was unemployment. Job losses could not be stemmed until liquidation of SMEs halted, and this feat accomplished only by enabling access to capital.  In short, the most direct and rapid solution to stem job losses is to incent private enterprise to originate and monetize rescue-financing loans for struggling SMEs.

The RLP, as presented, accesses unutilized TARP funds set aside for the PPIP Legacy Securities Program. Treasury originally intended $100 billion of TARP funds be used for PPIP programs but, to date, only $30 billion has been allocated. The RLP would use $30 billion for equity and debt investments. The program’s configuration is built upon structures previously announced and requires no additional funding from Congress. The RLP would save jobs, in a manner effective and quantified, through combined private and public sector solution. Private equity would absorb entire first loss, in advance of government loans and equity, significantly reducing taxpayer risk. The RLP would be temporary and replaced with private sector and bank financing as credit markets recover. http://www.smerescueloans.com/

Mr. Geithner, perhaps you believe safety of advice lies with big names like Goldman Sachs, Blackstone and Blackrock.  I suggest you revisit the history of my warnings and quality of advice. And if, sadly, you look only to safe haven, I am a self-made billionaire who has saved 150 companies from liquidation and 250,000 jobs. I believe in America.  My hand remains extended to you. Please hear my call.

Sincerely,

Lynn Tilton

The Lending Gap Pierces a Hole in Heart of America’s Economy

Monday, October 19th, 2009

The Federal Reserve’s recent upbeat policy statement missed a major threat to the economy that small and middle market businesses across the country understand well: banks are not lending. Despite easy credit and trillions in bailouts, there still remains a vast divide between the “haves” of Wall Street and corporate America who have benefited from the spoils of taxpayer largess and the “have-nots” of small and midsize enterprises (“SMEs”) that have long been the source of a majority of American jobs. As the CEO of a distressed private equity firm, each week I review the requests of dozens of SMEs that are unable to attain loans. Without access to capital, many companies that might otherwise survive have had no choice but to liquidate. As this progression evolves, jobs are lost, technology and tribal knowledge are destroyed and America’s depressed industrial base erodes further.

Last month marked the tenth straight month of declines in commercial lending. Since the crisis commenced, commercial lending has plummeted by 12% — this equates to an average of 1% each month. Never before during the post-war era have we witnessed a retrenchment in commercial lending so sustained and so severe. By some estimates, lending has contracted at the most rapid rate since the Great Depression. And it’s getting worse. Last month marked the largest one-month drop in lending in half-a-century and September’s outlook is little better. In the first two weeks of September, commercial lending has already declined almost one full percent. The latest Congressional Oversight Panel TARP report, released last month, too, does not portend well for our future. That report illustrates a nose-dive of 43% in new commitments for commercial and industrial lending at large infused institutions during the months between October 2008 and this summer.

Small and middle market companies, especially those that are “the maker of things,” depend on working capital loans from banks to operate their businesses in the ordinary course — to finance inventory purchases and to fund payroll and other operating expenses. In every business there are timing differences between the spend of capital to manufacture and deliver a product or service and the payment for those goods or services by customers. Battered by a perfect storm of declining revenues and a dearth of credit, companies that in previous recessions would have achieved workout solutions and forbearance from banks, or rescue financing from alternative lenders, are shutting their doors and terminating workers.

Alarmingly, with more than thirty bailout programs offered by Washington since the crisis began, not one addresses directly the dearth of lending to SMEs. Policymakers have found comfort in their delusion that an artificially supported Wall Street will transcend to magical solutions for the rest of the economy. We have spent trillions of taxpayer dollars to execute that chosen strategy, and yet, one year later, the financial crisis continues to gorge a gaping hole in the heart of our economy. Until we face the undeniable truth that the conventional banking system remains too damaged to resume its rightful role as the lubricant of commerce, a real recovery has no chance to take root.

The good news is that this problem is easily addressed. We already have a construct for a public-private program intended to purchase toxic assets from the balance sheets of banks. The model that Treasury established for the Legacy Securities Public-Private Investment Partnership could easily be modified to encourage private investment managers to originate new loans to SMEs. The program would target only those companies that have been unable to access traditional bank lending and would be a temporary measure to plug the lending gap while injured banks recover. The program could be more than fully financed with unused funds already set aside for public-private investment programs. As such, the plan will require no additional appropriations from Congress. In fact, the plan I propose is carefully constructed to deliver investment returns to taxpayers at very low risk.

Unlike the public-private programs for toxic assets, already hampered by unyielding banks with little motivation to sell, there is no shortage of SMEs in desperate need of loans. With access to low-cost government financing, private investment managers, carefully screened through a transparent and thorough process, will be anxious to participate.

America’s small and midsize companies, those still suffering under the burden of Wall Street mistakes, are the very same businesses that have long played by the rules and operated as the engine of job-creation and economic growth in America. A government program to support lending would both foster the rebuilding of this country’s manufacturing base and facilitate the historical role of SMEs to create and sustain jobs and to afford the opportunity to a workforce to earn its living with dignity.

More information is available at www.SMERescueLoans.com.

WHITE PAPER: PPIP Rescue Loans Program

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

PPIP Rescue Loans Program
A Public-Private Program to Sustain and Create Employment through Incentives for Private Rescue Lending

Summary
As financially impaired banks have retrenched from traditional secured lending to middle-market companies to preserve capital and repair balance sheets, a gaping hole in our financing economy has been shaped. More than eighty percent of this country’s work force is housed in companies with fewer than 500 employees.  Middle-market and smaller companies, the backbone of the American economy, have lost access to the traditional working capital loans upon which they have long depended for managing businesses in the ordinary course.  As a consequence to this sudden dearth of capital available in this market, companies that might otherwise rationalize and survive the current economic downturn are laying off workers — layoffs that will result in permanent job losses as, without access to capital, these companies have no choice but to liquidate.  This phenomenon is driving not only permanent job losses, but also the eclipse of technology and the destruction of transferable industrial knowledge, causing irreparable damage to the American economy.  The Rescue Loans Program (PPIP-RLP) would exploit unused TARP funding intended for the Public Private Investment Partnership (PPIP) to incentivize qualified private investors to provide rescue financing to companies unable to access the bank loan or credit markets, temporarily filling the lending/financing void left by banks, hedge funds and collateral debt obligations (CDOs).  Access to rescue financing will save many companies that might otherwise liquidate — with a direct and immediately quantifiable sustainment of employment — and will simultaneously assuage the immediate and overwhelming threat to our economy, rising unemployment.

  • The PPIP-RLP would function under the existing PPIP.
  • The program’s configuration would be built upon structures already announced in the existing PPIP Legacy Securities Program and the PPIP Legacy Loans Program.
  • The program would require no additional funding from Congress.
  • The RLP would save jobs, in a manner that can be immediately effective and quantified, through a combined private and public sector solution.
  • The private sector equity will absorb the entire first loss, ahead of both the government loans and the government equity contribution, significantly reducing taxpayer risk.
  • The government program will be temporary and will be replaced with private sector and bank financing as the credit markets recover.

Read the full white paper:  PPIP Rescue Loans Program (pdf)

© 2010 Patriarch Partners, LLC