Subscribe 

Posts Tagged ‘Barack Obama’

Obama Pay Your Dues

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

As a native New Yorker, I am forever tempted by dinner and show. Wednesday night, while neither wined nor dined, I was mesmerized by the President’s performance. The Commander in Chief used the “theater of the address” in his State of the Union speech to launch his revival of Candidate Obama, The Common Man: a wonderful mix of Mr. Smith Goes to Washington and Mr. Obama Feigns Not, He Leads Washington.

Candidate Obama took our hands and started a slow stroll down Selective Memory Lane as he recounted his arrival in town by turnip truck, his miraculous election to President and his sudden shock at finding himself “a stranger in a foreign land” of politicians and people who expected government to “do stuff”, all while the economy was teetering on the precipice of abyss with the dangers of all things “really bad.”

While he could not easily understand or persuade these foreigners, he would rather rely on Rahm Emanuel, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi to do that for him, as his mission was directed only towards “doing good” and “helping people.” President Obama saved the banks only to discover later that banks house the bankers, who covet money with bold expectations of big bonus checks, every year without consequence of risk or reward.

The funny thing about Selective Memory Lane, however, is it often leads us in circles and sometimes to dead ends. Candidate Obama takes full credit for resolving the mess he came into, but the mess he allegedly fixed was the salvation of banks. In truth, the fix was in for the banks when President Bush and Treasury Secretary Paulson appropriated money from under the TARP and gave it freely to them, no strings attached. Ben Bernanke played his part, too, when he turned the Fed into the grandest junk yard in the financial world, buying up that which no one else wanted at prices ant New Yorker would call, insane!

For a while, the official word upheld the stimulus package, cleverly crafted by Reid and Pelosi, as the reason to claim credit. Only the stimulus did not create credit nor jobs, real or imagined, and unemployment soared to desperate heights. Things were getting very confusing Wednesday night, indeed.

Everyone wanted health care reform, but ironically no one welcomed President Obama’s proposal. The Common Man recognized rapidly the bill too large, while Candidate Obama maintained the measure unpopular because at 2,000 pages, the bill was too large. Adding insult to injury, he learned a new guy in a truck was coming to town and he professed a few ideas on health care, as well. So, it was such that the stage was set this week for Candidate Obama to engage in an all-out, one-sided debate (where was Joe Wilson when we needed him?) with The Common Man, calling out boldly to the greedy bankers to give back the money, to politicians to cease being politicians and to any citizen who had a better bill on health care, the request to bring it on. I have a bill for Candidate Obama, but I believe it to be distinct from the kind he expects. I have a bill that says there is no free lunch in this town, or in Washington.

Candidate Obama took one too many wrong turns down Selective Memory Lane when he announced his plan to use $30 billion of TARP funds to make loans available to small and mid-sized businesses with the purpose of job creation in America. His mandate is a great idea. I really like it. In fact, I liked it last July when I first proposed it to the White House and the Department of the Treasury. I liked it when I created a website to garner support, and again at the time I published my white paper on the idea. I liked it when President Obama announced a jobs summit and did not invite small business owners like me — make that — he did not invite me, to the meeting. So let me borrow a little bit from Candidate Obama — “let’s make this perfectly clear” — I did not authorize The Common Man to take my idea and claim it his own. More importantly, like the common cheat in school who looks over his shoulder for the answer, The Common Man missed a key point when he copied. The money will not create jobs if it is made available only to banks.

Remember the lesson of last year: banks have bankers in them. And, in this case, many of the small banks, to whom he will give this money, have big problems and will use it to fix broken balance sheets and bad loans already held. I knew this risk when I created my plan, now known as the Obama Plan. It is for this reason that the original plan states that TARP funds are used to provide capital support to lever investments in new rescue loans made by selected experienced investors in the public sector who choose to own them.

So it is time to pay the piper — or the writer, as the case may be — and Candidate Obama, here is your bill:

2010-02-01-checkplease

Mr. Geithner—Do you hear me calling?

Friday, December 4th, 2009

Dear Mr. Geithner,

I struggle to understand why you ignore my letters and calls?  I appreciate the depth and breadth of issues you face, decisions to make and responsibility to bear. Yet I came myriad times with well thought solutions to lending problems that plague our nation, built upon tactical proven business experience.  I volunteered my time, my patented portfolio construction models, and designed solutions to solve the dearth of lending to small and mid-sized companies, (“SMEs”).  With patriotic hat in hand, asking for nothing, I offered demonstrated solutions upon which the Patriarch platform, a $ 7 billion business has thrived over 9 years.  Still my letters remain unanswered and my SME Rescue Loans Program (“RLP”) lies dormant in Treasury hands.

Joblessness is a plague upon America. Including part-time workers coveting full time employ and marginally unattached, those indelibly discouraged, almost 30 million Americans suffer under weight of unemployment.  If each unemployed heads families of 4, joblessness brings suffering to 120 million Americans. I am consistent in my verse, my chorus the same for 14 months - the absence of lending to SMEs would bring rapidly rising unemployment and stall the engine of job creation.  My plans, acknowledged, would have significantly reduced populace pain.

Last October, in response to a Treasury Plan to rescue large banks without mandate to lend, I purchased ads in the Washington Post and New York Times to express deep fears that TARP-infused banks would use Treasury-injected capital to heal internal wounds by selfish means, leaving SMEs without resources for recovery.  I foretold middle market manufacturers, unsung heroes and hope for this nation would be rendered prime casualties and appealed for a national commitment to sustain our core economic base. I proposed a Provisional Federal Bank to lend directly to deserving businesses. http://patriarchpartners.com/Lynn_Tilton_WashPost_NYT.pdf

On February 2, I sent an open letter, covered by national press, acknowledging the unprecedented obstacles to America’s economy. I addressed the implausible challenges in form of ideas for consideration that, together, represented a multi-spoke approach to foster economic recovery. I warned measures beyond TARP programs needed immediate implementation to avoid a punishing downturn and that SMEs, the backbone of America and its largest employer, remained starved for credit.  I insisted upon rapid and ineradicable acceptance that America’s future relies more heavily upon revival of industry and creation of jobs than resurrection of complex financial instruments.http://www.patriarchpartners.com/open_letter_Geithner.pdf

In late March, I published an editorial titled Tim, Why won’t “you” take a chance on lending? I suggested waiting for banks to heed your call to “take a chance on lending” made little sense and held low probability for triumph. I advised reduction of distance between problem and solution to enhance probability of success should be a lesson embraced.

I questioned your bank reliance and bank confidence, the cost and time to motivate institutions to lend. I feared millions of jobs lost while awaiting banks embark upon the lending crusade.  From whence came assurances cash infused or toxic assets removed would inspire immediate lending to businesses damaged by interim starvation? I believed it time to face the harsh fact that TARP failed to revive lending. I suggested the shortest path between need to unlock credit and emergency loans available was use of Government funds. http://patriarchpartners.com/dust2diamonds/2009/03/tim-why-won’t-you-take-a-chance-on-lending/

In July, I visited Treasury to present a plan designed upon the simple premise the foremost obstacle to economic recovery was unemployment. Job losses could not be stemmed until liquidation of SMEs halted, and this feat accomplished only by enabling access to capital.  In short, the most direct and rapid solution to stem job losses is to incent private enterprise to originate and monetize rescue-financing loans for struggling SMEs.

The RLP, as presented, accesses unutilized TARP funds set aside for the PPIP Legacy Securities Program. Treasury originally intended $100 billion of TARP funds be used for PPIP programs but, to date, only $30 billion has been allocated. The RLP would use $30 billion for equity and debt investments. The program’s configuration is built upon structures previously announced and requires no additional funding from Congress. The RLP would save jobs, in a manner effective and quantified, through combined private and public sector solution. Private equity would absorb entire first loss, in advance of government loans and equity, significantly reducing taxpayer risk. The RLP would be temporary and replaced with private sector and bank financing as credit markets recover. http://www.smerescueloans.com/

Mr. Geithner, perhaps you believe safety of advice lies with big names like Goldman Sachs, Blackstone and Blackrock.  I suggest you revisit the history of my warnings and quality of advice. And if, sadly, you look only to safe haven, I am a self-made billionaire who has saved 150 companies from liquidation and 250,000 jobs. I believe in America.  My hand remains extended to you. Please hear my call.

Sincerely,

Lynn Tilton

Obama’s Small Business Plan: Recognition of the Problem is a Critical First Step, But Much More is Needed

Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009

From the Huffington Post, October 27, 2009

Obama’s Small Business Plan: Recognition of the Problem is a Critical First Step, But Much More is Needed

By Lynn Tilton

The plan announced last week by President Obama to encourage lending to small businesses, in its recognition of the severity of the problem, is a noble first step. However, if we are truly committed to the salvation and revival of America’s small and mid-sized businesses and to saving and creating jobs, a more comprehensive plan is required. The Obama plan, while well intentioned, places the onus, in its entirety, on community banks to restart lending.  In theory and political pacification, this might make sense, but in practice, it will never work. And we are out of time. The plan we place forth now must offer an immediate and effective solution or permanent unemployment will plague us for decades.

Community banks have not been able to ride the full force and effect of TARP and other government programs. They struggle under the weight of large non-performing home loan mortgage and commercial real estate portfolios, with the rates of defaults showing no sign of deceleration.  Most community banks fight for their own survival, and regardless of incentives, are in no position to provide resources or inure the detriment of risks inherent to lending to small businesses, many in liquidity crises. Moreover, many community banks will be wary to accept the reporting requirements and conditions attached to TARP funds. The Independent Community Bankers of America, its primary trade association, immediately expressed concerns following Obama’s announcement.  “It’s uncertain how many community banks will use the program given the current examination environment and the conditions Congress has imposed on TARP funds,” Cam Fine, president and CEO of the ICBA said in the release.

We need a plan that is designed to ensure funds will reach small and mid-sized enterprises (SMEs) directly and with requisite sense of urgency. More than 70% of America’s work force is housed in SMEs and the liquidation of these businesses continue daily because they have no access to the basic working capital loans needed to operate their businesses. SMEs are the backbone of our economy, and they are in desperate need of support. Permanent unemployment will reach epidemic levels if finding a solution to continued job loss is not our nation’s priority. The SME Rescue Loan Program (RLP), my proposal to address this crisis, provides a qualitative and tactical plan founded in a patented quantitative solution that protects taxpayer dollars. For more information, see www.smerescueloans.com.

Earlier this summer, I proposed the RLP as a natural expansion to the Public–Private Investment Partnership (PPIP) under TARP. The existing PPIP, announced a year ago, was established by Treasury to purchase toxic assets from bank balance sheets. With time, it has grown evident toxic assets are neither the major danger to our economy or obstacle to new lending.

The RLP is designed to address the current threat to our economy within the construct of Treasury’s original plan. The RLP is drafted to support origination of new loans to those SMEs that cannot access traditional bank lending.  Because it is based on an existing program, the RLP can be implemented with rapidity.  And by reliance on private investment managers, who demonstrate the risk profile for troubled credits, rather than community banks, probability for success is exponentially enhanced.

A year ago, the implosion of credit markets began as a Wall Street crisis but rapidly spread to Main Street, paving a path of destruction. Credit markets seized and the global economy appeared to stand on the precipice of collapse.  Governments intervened with myriad programs designed to slow the pace of damage.  These programs succeeded, to varying degrees. Although grave risk of impending financial collapse may be behind us, the economy remains fragile. The fall-out from the crisis of last autumn has given way to new and dangerous threats of extremely high unemployment and permanent job losses, a prospect more frightening than others to Main Street Americans.  Absent an immediate rescue, unemployment could peak in excess of 12 percent with underemployment levels approaching 20 percent, exacerbating demand destruction and further economic deterioration.

With each passing day, the schism between Wall Street, Washington and Main Street widens. The American people grow increasingly incredulous with the complacency of Washington leadership.  Spreading optimism, in the face of Main Street hopelessness, is an affront that will no longer be borne. Wall Street buoyancy adds insult to injury, and Americans will not accept Wall Street bailouts founded upon taxpayer dollars with no meaningful action to save American jobs. We have a plan that initiates rescue financing and saves jobs in a manner that can be immediately effective by means of a combined private and public sector solution. The time to act is now.

Click here for more by Lynn Tilton at the Huffington Post.

© 2010 Patriarch Partners, LLC