Subscribe 

Posts Tagged ‘obama administration’

Obama Pay Your Dues

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

As a native New Yorker, I am forever tempted by dinner and show. Wednesday night, while neither wined nor dined, I was mesmerized by the President’s performance. The Commander in Chief used the “theater of the address” in his State of the Union speech to launch his revival of Candidate Obama, The Common Man: a wonderful mix of Mr. Smith Goes to Washington and Mr. Obama Feigns Not, He Leads Washington.

Candidate Obama took our hands and started a slow stroll down Selective Memory Lane as he recounted his arrival in town by turnip truck, his miraculous election to President and his sudden shock at finding himself “a stranger in a foreign land” of politicians and people who expected government to “do stuff”, all while the economy was teetering on the precipice of abyss with the dangers of all things “really bad.”

While he could not easily understand or persuade these foreigners, he would rather rely on Rahm Emanuel, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi to do that for him, as his mission was directed only towards “doing good” and “helping people.” President Obama saved the banks only to discover later that banks house the bankers, who covet money with bold expectations of big bonus checks, every year without consequence of risk or reward.

The funny thing about Selective Memory Lane, however, is it often leads us in circles and sometimes to dead ends. Candidate Obama takes full credit for resolving the mess he came into, but the mess he allegedly fixed was the salvation of banks. In truth, the fix was in for the banks when President Bush and Treasury Secretary Paulson appropriated money from under the TARP and gave it freely to them, no strings attached. Ben Bernanke played his part, too, when he turned the Fed into the grandest junk yard in the financial world, buying up that which no one else wanted at prices ant New Yorker would call, insane!

For a while, the official word upheld the stimulus package, cleverly crafted by Reid and Pelosi, as the reason to claim credit. Only the stimulus did not create credit nor jobs, real or imagined, and unemployment soared to desperate heights. Things were getting very confusing Wednesday night, indeed.

Everyone wanted health care reform, but ironically no one welcomed President Obama’s proposal. The Common Man recognized rapidly the bill too large, while Candidate Obama maintained the measure unpopular because at 2,000 pages, the bill was too large. Adding insult to injury, he learned a new guy in a truck was coming to town and he professed a few ideas on health care, as well. So, it was such that the stage was set this week for Candidate Obama to engage in an all-out, one-sided debate (where was Joe Wilson when we needed him?) with The Common Man, calling out boldly to the greedy bankers to give back the money, to politicians to cease being politicians and to any citizen who had a better bill on health care, the request to bring it on. I have a bill for Candidate Obama, but I believe it to be distinct from the kind he expects. I have a bill that says there is no free lunch in this town, or in Washington.

Candidate Obama took one too many wrong turns down Selective Memory Lane when he announced his plan to use $30 billion of TARP funds to make loans available to small and mid-sized businesses with the purpose of job creation in America. His mandate is a great idea. I really like it. In fact, I liked it last July when I first proposed it to the White House and the Department of the Treasury. I liked it when I created a website to garner support, and again at the time I published my white paper on the idea. I liked it when President Obama announced a jobs summit and did not invite small business owners like me — make that — he did not invite me, to the meeting. So let me borrow a little bit from Candidate Obama — “let’s make this perfectly clear” — I did not authorize The Common Man to take my idea and claim it his own. More importantly, like the common cheat in school who looks over his shoulder for the answer, The Common Man missed a key point when he copied. The money will not create jobs if it is made available only to banks.

Remember the lesson of last year: banks have bankers in them. And, in this case, many of the small banks, to whom he will give this money, have big problems and will use it to fix broken balance sheets and bad loans already held. I knew this risk when I created my plan, now known as the Obama Plan. It is for this reason that the original plan states that TARP funds are used to provide capital support to lever investments in new rescue loans made by selected experienced investors in the public sector who choose to own them.

So it is time to pay the piper — or the writer, as the case may be — and Candidate Obama, here is your bill:

2010-02-01-checkplease

Mr. Geithner—Do you hear me calling?

Friday, December 4th, 2009

Dear Mr. Geithner,

I struggle to understand why you ignore my letters and calls?  I appreciate the depth and breadth of issues you face, decisions to make and responsibility to bear. Yet I came myriad times with well thought solutions to lending problems that plague our nation, built upon tactical proven business experience.  I volunteered my time, my patented portfolio construction models, and designed solutions to solve the dearth of lending to small and mid-sized companies, (“SMEs”).  With patriotic hat in hand, asking for nothing, I offered demonstrated solutions upon which the Patriarch platform, a $ 7 billion business has thrived over 9 years.  Still my letters remain unanswered and my SME Rescue Loans Program (“RLP”) lies dormant in Treasury hands.

Joblessness is a plague upon America. Including part-time workers coveting full time employ and marginally unattached, those indelibly discouraged, almost 30 million Americans suffer under weight of unemployment.  If each unemployed heads families of 4, joblessness brings suffering to 120 million Americans. I am consistent in my verse, my chorus the same for 14 months - the absence of lending to SMEs would bring rapidly rising unemployment and stall the engine of job creation.  My plans, acknowledged, would have significantly reduced populace pain.

Last October, in response to a Treasury Plan to rescue large banks without mandate to lend, I purchased ads in the Washington Post and New York Times to express deep fears that TARP-infused banks would use Treasury-injected capital to heal internal wounds by selfish means, leaving SMEs without resources for recovery.  I foretold middle market manufacturers, unsung heroes and hope for this nation would be rendered prime casualties and appealed for a national commitment to sustain our core economic base. I proposed a Provisional Federal Bank to lend directly to deserving businesses. http://patriarchpartners.com/Lynn_Tilton_WashPost_NYT.pdf

On February 2, I sent an open letter, covered by national press, acknowledging the unprecedented obstacles to America’s economy. I addressed the implausible challenges in form of ideas for consideration that, together, represented a multi-spoke approach to foster economic recovery. I warned measures beyond TARP programs needed immediate implementation to avoid a punishing downturn and that SMEs, the backbone of America and its largest employer, remained starved for credit.  I insisted upon rapid and ineradicable acceptance that America’s future relies more heavily upon revival of industry and creation of jobs than resurrection of complex financial instruments.http://www.patriarchpartners.com/open_letter_Geithner.pdf

In late March, I published an editorial titled Tim, Why won’t “you” take a chance on lending? I suggested waiting for banks to heed your call to “take a chance on lending” made little sense and held low probability for triumph. I advised reduction of distance between problem and solution to enhance probability of success should be a lesson embraced.

I questioned your bank reliance and bank confidence, the cost and time to motivate institutions to lend. I feared millions of jobs lost while awaiting banks embark upon the lending crusade.  From whence came assurances cash infused or toxic assets removed would inspire immediate lending to businesses damaged by interim starvation? I believed it time to face the harsh fact that TARP failed to revive lending. I suggested the shortest path between need to unlock credit and emergency loans available was use of Government funds. http://patriarchpartners.com/dust2diamonds/2009/03/tim-why-won’t-you-take-a-chance-on-lending/

In July, I visited Treasury to present a plan designed upon the simple premise the foremost obstacle to economic recovery was unemployment. Job losses could not be stemmed until liquidation of SMEs halted, and this feat accomplished only by enabling access to capital.  In short, the most direct and rapid solution to stem job losses is to incent private enterprise to originate and monetize rescue-financing loans for struggling SMEs.

The RLP, as presented, accesses unutilized TARP funds set aside for the PPIP Legacy Securities Program. Treasury originally intended $100 billion of TARP funds be used for PPIP programs but, to date, only $30 billion has been allocated. The RLP would use $30 billion for equity and debt investments. The program’s configuration is built upon structures previously announced and requires no additional funding from Congress. The RLP would save jobs, in a manner effective and quantified, through combined private and public sector solution. Private equity would absorb entire first loss, in advance of government loans and equity, significantly reducing taxpayer risk. The RLP would be temporary and replaced with private sector and bank financing as credit markets recover. http://www.smerescueloans.com/

Mr. Geithner, perhaps you believe safety of advice lies with big names like Goldman Sachs, Blackstone and Blackrock.  I suggest you revisit the history of my warnings and quality of advice. And if, sadly, you look only to safe haven, I am a self-made billionaire who has saved 150 companies from liquidation and 250,000 jobs. I believe in America.  My hand remains extended to you. Please hear my call.

Sincerely,

Lynn Tilton

A Year Later — My Clarion Call to America Left Unanswered

Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009

From the Huffington Post (Nov. 2, 2009)

A Year Later — My Clarion Call to America Left Unanswered

By Lynn Tilton

One year ago, in response to a Treasury Plan to rescue large banks without mandate for lending, I rose defiantly from my comfort zone below the radar screen to speak my mind and deliver “truth” to America.  My fears, unfortunately since confirmed, was that Tarp-infused banks would use Treasury-injected capital to heal internal wounds left by lax controls, leverage upon leverage and abuse of synthetic instruments, leaving small and middle market businesses  without resources for recovery.

I argued that financial engineering had long distorted the value of our markets and seduced Americans into a false security of increasing GDP, dismissing the need for value creation through production of goods and delivery of services. I foretold that middle market manufacturers, the unsung heroes and hope for this nation, would be rendered prime casualties of the credit crisis and appealed for a national commitment to sustain the nation’s core economic base.  At the time, I had proposed a Provisional Federal Bank to lend directly to deserving businesses.  My call was early, my premise sound, my concerns verified but my solution ideologically rebuffed.  As such, unemployment became the defining force of our nation leaving the engine of job creation without fuel for production.

Amidst the unraveling of the American dream in its sudden transcendence to nightmare of foreclosures, layoffs and the destruction of our financial institutions, never once did I witness the direct delivery of truth to Americans. The potential damage to Main Street and warnings of expected job losses were quashed under the guise of containing fear. Truth, albeit cold and hard, is the starting point on the path to recovery and renewal.  With truth, the unknown vanishes, panic and fear subside and the long journey home can begin.  In contrast, Americans were left to believe that they could sit back confident of receiving the trickle-down benefits of financial institution salvation and stability. But banks never lent, much of our SME community did not survive and 26 million Americans are unemployed. Many Americans remain shocked and stunned by the precipitous unraveling of their family lives—no clarion call was sounded for them.

On Thursday of this week, the markets and the White House celebrated the end of the worst recession since World War II. The American government reported that GDP, a broad measure of the U.S. economy, had risen 3.5% on an annualized basis in the third quarter of 2009.  However, any analysis of the variables readily highlights the potency of temporary government stimulus in that growth, with largest components of spending strength reflected in car purchases and new home building, two agendas broadly supported by federal programs.  But before we commence any celebration, it should be clearly noted that consumer confidence declined in October and that unemployment continues its rise with no anticipated immediacy of relief. Christine Romer, lead White House Economic advisor, warned on Thursday that unemployment will remain “severely elevated” throughout 2010.

Main Street Americans remain confused by the conflicting data, seeking answers to the timing and type of recovery that brings relief to their despairing lives.  It is impossible for Main Street to unravel the data, signs of recovery or actions best taken to share in the relief that envelops Wall Street and corporate America.  And so I return to my entreating treatise of last year and ask again, when will we deliver truth to Americans?  When will we accept that people are paralyzed by the “unknown” and seek to fully understand the dichotomy between the recovery they hear and desolation they recognize?

We are living in “interesting times” and the road to resurgence will be long and fraught with obstacles.  A plan for economic recovery that comforts and assuage fears will necessitate focus on job creation and available credit to small and mid-sized enterprises. To bridge the great divide- the casualty of last year’s TARP focus- we will need honest assessment of damage, executable solutions that defy political objections and a clarion call for patience and discipline among Americans who must slowly rebuild their lives.  This passage starts with delivery of “truth” so that jobless and hopeless Americans clearly understand their long hard journey just now begins.

This country has long been a meritocracy founded upon education and work ethic, a nation in which each one of us could overcome the circumstance of birth to live the American dream. This is not a time in our nation’s history for panic, self-pity, entitlement or complacency; it is a time for discipline, hard work and cooperation. But it is also a time for truth, change and recognition that we cannot leave Main Street America behind.

In the words of Winston Churchill, “In war as in life, it is often necessary when some cherished scheme has failed, to take up the best alternative open, and if so, it is folly not to work for it with all your might.” We must never forget the inextricable link between great power and great responsibility; when much is given, much is expected. The path to economic recovery begins with truth.

To read the Clarion Call……http://www.patriarchpartners.com/Lynn_Tilton_WashPost_NYT.pdf

© 2010 Patriarch Partners, LLC